Flyleaf Publishing logo

Our Science of Reading Alignment

We are Committed to Contributing to the (R)evolution of the Science of Literacy.

Our commitment to developing instructional materials grounded in the Science of Reading began in 1998. Our instructional design has been guided by research that supports models like the Simple View of Reading1 and Scarborough's Reading Rope,2 and continues to evolve as we acknowledge research findings that inform new models, including the Active View of Reading Model.3

  1. 1

    The Simple View of Reading

    This model demonstrates that reading comprehension is the product of two component skills: decoding (or word recognition) and language comprehension.

    Simple View Of Reading Infographic
  2. 2

    Scarborough’s Reading Rope

    This model illustrates how the component skills of word recognition and language comprehension are made up of "strands" of subset skills, all of which weave together and become increasingly strategic and automatic to result in skilled reading.

    Scarborought's Reading Rope Infographic
  3. 3

    The Active View of Reading

    This model represents an evolution of current research findings and provides a more detailed representation of four domains of knowledge, skills, and strategies required for skilled reading: active self-regulation, word recognition, bridging processes, and language comprehension.

    Active View Of Reading Infographic

    While the Active View of Reading aligns with earlier models, focusing on word recognition and language comprehension as two of the major domains contributing to successful reading, the model includes a domain of “bridging processes” to illustrate the component skills that support, or bridge, the interactions between word recognition and language comprehension. The Active View of Reading also includes a self-regulation domain, which illustrates the roles of engagement and motivation, executive function skills, and strategy use in reading.

    The Active View of Reading Model integrates both the “products” of reading (e.g., phonological awareness, alphabetic principle, and cultural/content knowledge) with the processes that students need to develop as they learn to become effective readers (e.g., decoding skills, verbal reasoning skills, and strategy use). The model also acknowledges the role that text, task, and sociocultural contexts play in reading.

Our Alignment to the Science of Reading

The early literacy instructional materials that we intentionally create on behalf of teachers and students align with the converging, interdisciplinary research around the Science of Reading. Our products offer opportunities for explicit and systematic instruction, assessment, and application of all components of early literacy development. The result is a continuum of integrated instructional experiences that mirror the remarkable way our brains simultaneously employ skills, strategies, and processes when making meaning from text.

Footnotes

  1. Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.
  2. Scarborough, H.S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S.B. Neuman & D.K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 1, pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford.
  3. Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25-S44.

Would you like to learn more?

  • Our Approach

    Learn about our unique, evidence-based, integrated approach to instruction.

    Learn More
  • View Samples

    Browse our book-by-book sample materials. We have a lot to share.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Explore the resources and support that are available in our Community.

    Learn More

Are you sure you want to download this file?